Detecting Snow Cover, Bare Ground, Water and Ice Clouds
using GOES-9 Multispectral Imagery on Nov. 6, 1996
Kevin J. Schrab, NWS/WRH/SSD
1. Introduction
This short case study shows that multispectral GOES-9 imagery is very
useful in detecting snow cover, bare ground, water clouds, and ice clouds.
Visible, IR (11um), and the reflectivity product will be used to make
feature identifications. For a short description of how the reflectivity
product is generated, see TALITE
96-08.
2. Inspection of the multispectral imagery
The data that we will inspect is from 2000 UTC on November 6, 1996.
Figures 1-4 show the VIS, IR (11um), reflectivity
product, and enhanced IR (11um) images, respectively. Examine these images
and try to determine where the following features are located: 1) snow cover,
2) bare ground, 3) water clouds, and 4) ice (cirrus) clouds. Figure 4 is
enhanced so that every 5 degrees Celsius has a unique color to help better
identify temperatures of all features in the scene (not just cold cloud tops).
3. Interpretation of the multispectral imagery
Each type of feature to be detected will be discussed before showing the
same imagery as in Figures 1-4, except with all the
features identified.
It is evident from looking at the imagery that identification the
desired features is not a simple matter. First, lets try to identify snow
covered ground. In the visible image snow cover should be white (very reflective).
The reflectivity product should show snow cover as dark (snow is poorly reflective
at 3.9um, which is used to make this product). The IR image should show the area
of snow cover as generally cooler than surrounding bare ground. One location that
shows these features is the Sierras of California. Can you find and others?
Second, let's try to identify regions of bare ground. Obviously, the visible
data will be mainly used for this identification. It should be noted that bare
ground has a wide range of reflectivity in the 3.9um wavelength, so the reflectivity
product shows great variation in bare ground regions. It is obvious (from the visible
data) that large areas of Nevada are bare ground. Can you find other locations with
bare ground?
Third, water clouds are to be identified. In this case, the reflectivity product
is going to be very useful. The reflectivity product is enhanced so that the most
reflective surfaces are bright white to cyan. Water clouds are very reflective of
3.9um radiation so that in the reflectivity product they should be white or cyan. Also,
remember that snow cover is dark in the reflectivity product, this provides a good
mechanism to detect water clouds over snow. The visible and IR are complementary
in this identification. Over bare ground the visible imagery does quite well detecting
clouds. Also, the IR can be used to obtain cloud top temperatures to help determine
if the water clouds contain super-cooled water (at least at the cloud top). One area
of water clouds in located over southwest Idaho. Can you find any other locations with
water clouds?
Finally, cirrus (ice clouds) need to be identified. All 3 image products will be
used to identify cirrus clouds. The visible tends to show the cirrus (especially thin
cirrus) as wispy and light gray. The IR will tend to show rather cold cloud top
temperatures for cirrus (thin cirrus may be warmer than expected due to radiation
passing up through the cirrus from the surface). The reflectivity product usually
shows cirrus as dark since ice crystals are poorly reflective in the 3.9um wavelength.
Cirrus can show up as mottled dark and light in the reflectivity product due to the
low signal-to-noise ratio at cold temperatures in the 3.9um channel. One area of
cirrus is in northern Nevada (just south of the Oregon/Idaho border). This cirrus
is so thin that it is not seen in the reflectivity product. However, it is apparent
in the visible image as a light wispy area. It also appears in the IR image as an
area of colder temperatures (even though radiation from the surface results in an
apparent temperature that is warmer than would be expected for cirrus). Can you
find any other areas of cirrus?
Figures 5-8 show they various areas that have been
identified as snow cover, bare ground, water clouds, and ice clouds. Not all
possible features are identified, but enough are identified to get an idea of how powerful the
use of the multispectral imagery is to cloud and surface feature identification.
4. Summary
It is apparent that the use of multispectral imagery is a very powerful tool in
identifying surface and cloud features. It is important to use all possible image
channels in making feature identifications.
Please send your questions to
Kevin Schrab